Is Your Favorite Influencer Compromised? #BinderGate EXPOSED

How the White House Used Influencers to Gaslight the American People About "The Epstein Files"

I was melting into my black velvet couch on a quiet February morning in Los Angeles when I got an unexpected text from my former boss. It was a photo of her holding a white binder labeled The Epstein Files: Phase 1.

Beneath an oversized Department of Justice emblem, the cover read:
“The Most Transparent Administration In History
The 45th and 47th President of the United States
Donald J. Trump”
—all in a black, italicized serif font. The phrase “DECLASSIFIED” was stamped diagonally across the page, the last few letters bleeding into the DOJ seal. It was printed on plain white paper, slightly smaller than the binder itself, giving the whole thing the look of a last-minute Kinko’s print job—definitely not what you’d expect from a document claiming to hold the secrets of America’s most protected elite.

My first thought:
Why is the “I” in “In” capitalized?

Does the White House need a copy editor? And a graphic designer?

The presentation was sloppy. The messaging was silly. And the promise—comically farfetched. There was no way these Office Depot binders were the mystical trapper keepers that would finally expose Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirators, identities that have been shielded from the public for years.

Earlier that February morning, as rumors swirled that we might finally be “getting the list,” I couldn’t help myself. I rained on the parade with a moody carousel post complete with a Vampire Weekend piano cover.

“The moment we’ve all been waiting for: The Epstein List. I’d wager the reality will be far less exciting than the version we’ve scripted in our minds.

There will be no grand unraveling, no parade of the the guilty. Instead, a carefully measured disclosure, use enough to quell curiosity but never enough to dismantle the machine that enabled it.

And even if the client list is 100% real, unreacted & untouched— if it isn’t the spectacle we crave, will we even believe it? The truth rarely arrives with the force we expect. But imagination? That never fails us.”

I knew we weren’t getting the list.

I kept my skepticism to myself. I didn’t want to rain on my former boss’s moment. This was big for her—an exclusive invite to the Oval Office, one of just 15 influencers chosen by Pam Bondi to receive what was billed as never-before-seen (allegedly) declassified (allegedly) material.

It’s not every day someone hands you a white binder and tells you it might change history. I couldn’t fault her for saying yes. I’d be curious, too.

Some of the other lucky recipients included Liz Wheeler, Rogan O’Handley (DC_Draino), Jack Posobiec, Chad Prather, Chaya Raichik (LibsofTikTok), and Mike Cernovich. The room had influence.

A Getty photographer captured the moment—an image now etched into the absurdity of #BinderGate. A group of influencers stood outside the White House, proudly waving their binders in the air like VIP swag bags from Turning Point USA. Front and center was right-wing commentator Rogan “DC Draino” O’Handley, hoisting his binder like a prize he’d just won at a silent auction at Mar-a-Lago.

“Why are these influencers flaunting these binders around like it’s a new car and not a document containing disturbing information about a disturbing sex trafficking ring?” Online critics started asking questions after seeing the bizarre photo-op.

“Why is Pam Bondi using influencers to gatekeep sensitive information that should already be made available to the public?” others wondered, calling this event a “tacky, tone deaf PR stunt.”

The influencers drowned out the noise.

My former boss started posting aesthetic pictures and videos of the binder on her Instagram story. D.C. Draino started posting lengthy statements praising the administration’s transparency.

“Today I met with President Trump, VP JD Vance, AG Pam Bondi, and FBI Director Kash Patel in the Oval Office,” D.C. Draino wrote.

“They handed me a binder copy of the Epstein Files. This is the most transparent administration in American history. The best part? This is just the start. AG Bondi confirmed there are thousands more Epstein File documents being secretly held in the SDNY and they will be delivered to the DOJ in DC by February 28. People will be going to jail for what they've done,” D.C. Draino said that day in February, sounding confident that Epstein’s co-conspirators would finally be held accountable.

Unfortunately, his confidence didn’t land.

Releasing the so-called Epstein files through handpicked influencers and flimsy Office Depot binders felt less like transparency and more like gatekeeping dressed up as access.

Predictably, all hell broke loose on X.

#BinderGate was born (a Pisces).

Deep Dive Below:

#BinderGate Backlash

“Why them and not me?!” chanted major conservative voices left behind.

MAGA veterans and longtime Trump loyalists openly questioned what qualified this particular group of influencers to receive what quickly became the most coveted—and controversial—White House souvenir of the year: THE BINDER.

Laura Loomer was livid.

"I hate to say it, but the American people can't trust the validity of the Epstein files released today,” Loomer wrote on X.

"It was released in an unprofessional manner with paid, partisan social media influencers to curate their binders for us. I can't trust anything in the binder. Neither should you,” Loomer warned, skeptical of this PR stunt from the start.

"It was a photo opp. Influencers posed for pictures with cheap binders given to them by Pam Bondi who still doesn't want to explain why she never held Epstein accountable even though she was the Attorney General of Florida the entire time he was raping young girls in Florida,” Loomer said on X.

Some wrote Loomer’s criticism off as jealousy. Others made fun of her for not earning a binder despite her 24/7 loyalty to Daddy Trump. Most though, agreed.

Something was off about these binders.

---

Independent Journalists or Political Influencers?

The public started questioning the legitimacy of the meeting even more when they noticed that some of the chosen influencers were putting out similar statements, with nearly word-for-word copy. Their language sounded less like their signature brand of independent journalism and more like an influencer who accepted a high-paid brand deal with guidelines. These familiar voices started sounding unfamiliar.

One user highlighted how influencers DC Draino, Chad Prather and Jack Posobiec started using similar language in their posts, all three men telling their audience that “this is the most transparent administration in history.”

Are These Influencers Compromised?

Did White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt slip a script into all the binders that cold afternoon in February? A neatly packaged set of talking points, pre-approved by the new administration—complete with ready-to-post PR statements designed to keep the narrative in check?

At one point, that might’ve sounded “too conspiratorial.” Not anymore.

Now, it feels like the obvious trade-off for the D.C. treatment.
Access comes with expectations. And some of these voices, once seen as independent, are starting to sound like they’re reading from the same page.

Just a month later, some of those same influencers were invited back to the White House for a private luncheon with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The meeting was held under Chatham House rules, meaning participants could share what was said, but not who said it. A few hinted they would eventually share key takeaways with their audiences. Most never did.

When followers began demanding transparency, the influencers responded with the same vague deflections: “you had to be there,” or “I say yes to all invites!” “

David Harris Jr. captioned his photo “When you’re invited to a private mtg with a world leader, you go.”

The irony wasn’t lost. The same people who built platforms calling for accountability were now asking for blind trust without offering explanation.

Is this what the Trump administration really meant by “full transparency?”

#BinderGate: A Giant Nothingburger

When the long-hyped binders were finally revealed, the contents were underwhelming—pages of recycled documents we’ve seen before.

The influencers hyped their audiences up for nothing. Not a single elite was named. Prince Andrew somewhere grinning.

The public felt duped. Gaslit. Many were furious. Others saw it coming.
I reminded my followers: “Told you—we’re never getting that list.”

Laura Loomer publicly called for Trump to fire Pam Bondi over the fiasco.

“Enough is enough. Donald Trump needs some real vetting in his admin. The entire world is laughing at our country today. And if you say they aren’t, you’re full of s** or you’re one of the influencers who received the binder. This is honestly shocking levels of incompetence,”* she posted on X.

Over the past two months, both Bondi and Kash Patel have come under fire for their role in #BinderGate. Their former supporters—who once believed they were the two key figures hired to finally crack open the protected class—are now calling them out for failing to deliver on the very promise that earned them public trust.

---

Senior White House Officials Allegedly In the Dark about Bindergate

According to multiple sources familiar with the #BinderGate event, senior White House officials who organized the event had no idea Bondi was going to hand out binders titled “Epstein Files: Phase 1.” The influencers allegedly didn’t know either.

Sources told ABC News that Attorney General Pam Bondi and her team did not inform White House officials in advance that she planned to hand out binders, ones that we eventually learned contained almost no new information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. On March 4, ABC News reported that Bondi’s move “ruffled feathers among those closest to President Donald Trump,” including his senior White House staff.

Pam Bondi “Client List Sitting on My Desk”

A week before #BinderGate, Pam Bondi gave Americans hope that one day they’d see Epstein’s client list.

On February 21, host John Roberts on Fox News asked Bondi whether DOJ would release a list of Epstein’s clients.

“Will that really happen?” Roberts asked.

Bondi responded with the answer most Americans wanted to hear:

“It’s sitting on my desk right now to review. That’s been a directive by President Trump. I’m reviewing that,” she claimed.

In that moment, Bondi made it clear that a client list did exist. It was sitting on her desk. Four months later, and the White House wants you to believe she didn’t say that. And if she did, she “didn’t mean it.”

Sure, Pam…

FBI Changes Tune: “Epstein Didn’t Have Clients”

Just days after Sean “Diddy” Combs was acquitted on the most serious federal charges—sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy—the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI released a two-page “systematic review” that stunned even longtime Trump supporters.

In their two-page document review, a shocking new claim was made by the agencies that contradicts everything they previously told the American people.

“This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list.' There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions," the Justice Department and FBI said in the document.

They also made sure to include, once again, that Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.

Online, users erupted. Many began questioning whether former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi had ever explicitly promised a “client list” at all. The moment quickly made its way into the briefing room.

Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy confronted White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt directly.

“What happened to the Epstein client list that the attorney general said she had on her desk?” he asked.

Leavitt initially deflected, urging Doocy to “go back and look at what she actually said.” But Doocy came prepared, reading the quote back to her on camera:

“John Roberts said, ‘DOJ may be releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein’s clients. Will that really happen?’ And she said, ‘It’s sitting on my desk right now to review.’”

Cornered, Leavitt claimed:

“Yes, she was saying the entirety of all of the paperwork, all of the paper in relation to Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes. That’s what the attorney general was referring to, and I’ll let her speak for that.”

The moment confirmed what many had already suspected: there was never a “list” they intended to release.

Online Outrage

MAGA’s most loyal voices quickly turned on the administration, lashing out at Karoline Leavitt, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and anyone else pushing the narrative that an Epstein client list never existed.

Laura Loomer wasted no time. Tagging Donald Trump directly, she posted: “FIRE PAM BLONDI!”

RFK Jr. advisor Angie Stanton was equally confused. In a post on X, she questioned the sudden shift in messaging and openly wondered whether the entire ordeal had been a psyop. She later told her Instagram followers she was “taking a break from politics for a minute.”

“Can somebody please help me understand what’s going on? Elon said Trump was in the Epstein files… now the DOJ says there are no files, no list, no clients, and it was suicide. Has everyone been lying? Was this just another psyop?” Stanton wrote.

For many across the political spectrum, the DOJ’s sudden reversal wasn’t just frustrating, it felt like betrayal.

Old tweets from Vice President JD Vance in 2021 started surfacing asking the Vice President for “clarification.”

“Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child sex trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don’t talk about it,” a 2021 tweet read.

So, about that suicide…

---

Elon Musk Turns on Trump Right Before Launching Political Party

Just a few weeks ago, on June 5, when Elon and Trump were at odds online, Elon dropped a preemptive strike on Trump, accusing the President of being in the Epstein files.

“Time to drop the really big bomb:
RealDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”

MAGA influencers called him a clown. A crybaby. A billionaire with a bruised ego jilted by his political daddy.

But the next day, on June 6, he dropped a bomb of his own announcing he was launching a new political party called The America Party. A new movement for “the 80% in the middle.”

“America Party” has a nice ring to it. The party that actually represents America!” Musk posted on X.

At first nobody took it seriously—until the DOJ’s little two-page magic trick today.

Suddenly the most “transparent administration in history,” wants the public to believe that Epstein never blackmailed a single client.

Meanwhile, Elon—agent of chaos, master of the algorithm—somehow bailed before the great fumble of the FBI’s Epstein Files release. The timing seems far from impulsive.

In the coming days, I expect some of the same MAGA influencers who cheered him on to turn on him, surrendering their loyalty back to Trump. They’ll call Elon a traitor. An unstable lunatic. A liability to America First.

But deep down, the attacks won’t matter because Trump knows the influence he holds. Elon bought X to gain cultural and political relevancy. If Trump weren’t at least a little threatened, he’d come for Musk like he did Rosie O’Donnell. But he hasn’t. His Truth Social clapbacks are tame.

Last night on Piers Morgan Uncensored, Morgan’s guest said he believes Elon could be telling the truth about Trump’s ties with Epstein.

“Trump always threatens a lawsuit. Why didn’t Trump threaten to sue Elon Musk when Musk said Trump is all over the Epstein files? he asked.

---

#BinderGate Influencers React

Whether Democrat or Republican, nearly everyone seemed united in frustration yesterday. Social media erupted as people across the political spectrum began openly questioning the government, deeply dissatisfied with the DOJ and FBI’s abrupt conclusion.

Even DC Draino—one of MAGA’s most loyal voices, the face of #BinderGate—broke from the party line.

“Assuming this leaked Epstein memo is true, then we all know this is a shameful coverup to protect the most heinous elites,” he wrote. “We were told multiple times the files would be released, and now it looks like backroom deals have been made to keep them hidden.”

He didn’t stop there.

“You’re telling me the only publicly known client was a member of the UK Royal Family, and this blackmail operation didn’t touch every level of business and political power? No way,” he added. “We all know Epstein had a long client list full of household names. Now the entire country can see it—there are three tiers of justice in this country.”

Even he wasn’t buying this new version of the story.

Jack Posobeic appeared on Piers Morgan Uncensored yesterday and called yesterday’s report “indefensible.” He also supported the claim that the White House didn’t brief him and the other influencers on the “The Epstein Files: Phase 1.” According to Posobeic, the influencers had no idea the files contained information already available to the public and were caught off guard by the photo op.

“Look I was brought under the White House under a series of policy briefings,” Posobeic told Morgan. “Nobody told us prior to this that the “Epstein Files” would be anywhere on the agenda for that day. It was really sprung as a surprise to all of us. We get handed these binders and then before we even have a chance to look into them, we’re hauled out in front of the cameras that were there,” Posobeic claimed.

Meanwhile, my former boss is telling her followers to “move on from the binder fixation.” She’s urging her audience to let it go and shift their focus elsewhere—specifically to Steve Bannon, who she now claims is in possession of twelve hours of never-before-seen Epstein tapes.

What a convenient redirection.

Instead of calling out the White House like Draino or Posobiec, she’s telling her audience to focus on Steve Bannon—redirecting attention away from the real issue here: the government is lying to us.

Never mind the blatant gaslighting from the very officials we’re supposed to trust. Let’s get mad at Steve Bannon instead!

I miss the days when she was unafraid to challenge power. But something shifted. She’s not “exposing the elite anymore.” She’s protecting them.

A woman commented on my post earlier: “We should be outraged by this. We should all be in the streets.” That stuck with me. I remembered why I do this.

Because we’re being lied to and told to look away.

Only you can decide who still speaks for the people and who’s running cover for the machine. If something feels off, trust your instincts.

And of course, please stop holding your breath waiting for the client list.

You’re not getting it.

We never were.

---

Coming Up Next: A Post-Diddy Trial Analysis + Jerry Springer Courthouse Edition: YouTuber Wars + a Britney Spears Summer Series + Andy’s Meeting with Bam Margera